|
by
Bruce Dyer
In the face of the underlying
weakness of the American economy, there is a growing sense of inevitability
that sooner or later the dollar will be forced to depreciate, an event
that will have significant repercussions for the USA and the world economy.
The US dollar accounts for
almost 70% of global currency reserves - the money that nations use
to finance international trade and hold to protect their own currencies
against financial speculators. Because it is so dominant any marked
shift in its value would inevitably have major repercussions around
the world.
The global demand for dollars
has enabled the US to pay for considerably more than it earns from its
domestic production with 1991 being the only year in the past 20 in
which the US supplied more goods and services to the rest of the world
than it took in. In the other 19 years, the US has run a deficit on
its import-export account to the point where it has become the leading
debtor nation with a mind boggling $6.3 trillion dollar deficit (60%
of GDP).
Other structural imbalances
in the US’s economy include the recent return to annual budget deficits
in the hundreds of billions due to unaffordable 2001 tax cuts, unsustainable
credit expansion, corporate accounting abuses, near zero personal savings,
record personal indebtedness, and reliance on and over consumption of
Middle Eastern oil. i
These together with the build-up
of military spending, the Iraq war and the new Bush doctrine of pre-emptive
attacks on any country deemed to threaten the US’s future national security,
have led global investors and currency speculators to unload dollars
and US assets which in turn, has contributed to a rapid deterioration
in the US’s financial position. ii
According to William Grieder,
the national editor of The Rolling Stone, the US’s ambitions to run
the world, are heavily mortgaged. Fifteen years ago, its net foreign
indebtedness was zero. Before the US’s net balance of foreign assets
turned negative in 1988, it was a creditor nation itself, investing
and lending vast capital to others, always more than it borrowed. Now
Greider sees the trend line as most alarming. "Like any debtor who borrows
more year after year with no plausible way to reverse the trend, a nation
sinking deeper into debt enters into an adverse power relationship with
its creditors - greater and greater dependency." iii
The Euro meanwhile, is moving
closer to being a competing world currency. It suffers from none of
the major underlying crises afflicting the US economy and has appreciated
by one third against the dollar since early 2002, when it traded at
84 cents. This is remarkable in view of the fact that the European Union’s
economy is neither booming nor absorbing huge investment funds from
around the world. Moreover when next year the European Union acquires
10 new members, its GDP will be roughly the same as that of the US,
and its population 60% bigger. If adopted by all the members of the
union, the Euro will begin to look like a more stable and more attractive
investment than the dollar. iv
Despite these developments
Japan holds more than 90% of its reserves, and China the bulk of her
reserves in US dollars. While agreeing with the need for the dollar
to depreciate, Brendan O’Donovan chief economist with Westpac in New
Zealand expects that because the US remains the powerhouse of the world
economy and Asia’s main trade is with the US, the US dollar will maintain
its importance as a reserve currency.
An article in the Financial Times on the 30th July 2003 by Chen Zhao notes that China and Hong Kong have been buying more US Treasury securities than any other creditor nation, with combined annual purchases of $290bn. Also bigger than with any other country, is the US's bilateral trade deficit with China which has reached $110bn. With their reserves accumulating rapidly, buying
dollars is helping the Chinese keep their own currency steady. It has
also allowed US interest rates to remain low, which in turn has encouraged
American consumers to buy more Chinese goods.
While this game serves the purposes of Chinese
and US policy makers alike, Zhao believes it also creates economic and
financial distortions that are both self-limiting and self-defeating.
With a collapse in interest rates fuelling consumer spending, it is
conceivable that the US current account deficit will increase rapidly.
Zhao warns that "there is no magic number the current account deficit
must reach to signal an impending crisis – but there has never been
a nation that has been able to increase its reliance on foreign savings
without eventually hitting a brick wall". (Emphasis added.)
In response to his question "When will the game
playing come to an end?" he says "When the Chinese have had enough."
v
Some economists are concerned that a collapse in US living standards might be imminent because they believe the US current account deficit is reaching unsustainable levels. In 1999, Professor Catherine L. Mann of Vanderbilt University, investigated iv previous current account corrections in industrialised countries in the past twenty years. She concluded that a current account deficit of over 4.2% was unsustainable and that a correction in the US was likely in two or three years. "The US cannot live beyond its long-term means
forever, nor will US assets always be so favoured by global investors"
Mann wrote in an article vii ‘Is the US Current Account Deficit
Sustainable?’ published by the IMF in March 2000. "When a change in
investor sentiment comes, it could be dramatic. Were the dollar to be
depreciated by a significant amount of say 25 percent, she believes
"US consumers would shift from buying imported goods and services to
buying those made domestically and US labour markets would tighten further.
The combination of rising wages and a falling dollar likely would drive
up prices." Then, she believes, the Federal Reserve would try to choke
the developing inflation by raising interest rates, thus disrupting
financial markets around the world.
Caroline Freund of the Federal Reserve researched
the same ground as Mann and also found that the US deficit was unsustainable
except that she reckoned that the markets normally bring about these
corrections when the deficit rises above 5% of GDP rather than 4.2%.viii
With US deficit being expected to exceed 5% by the end of 2002, Mann
and Freund’s work led economists employed by stockbrokers and merchant
banks to alert their clients to the dollar’s potential fall.
Morgan Stanley is one of the world’s leading
financial investor firms. Steven Roach, Morgan Stanley’s chief economist,
warned ix several times early in 2002 of ‘a US balance of payments crisis by 2003’ and ‘America’s looming current-account adjustment’ while his colleague, Eric Chaney, talked x of ‘a massive devaluation’. Their predictions will certainly help bring about the crisis they warn of since they will be used by Morgan Stanley’s 61,000 employees around the world to encourage clients to switch out of the dollar into sterling or the euro. In short, the present system of world money creation is clearly unstable. Roach again - "Can a saving-short US economy
continue to finance an ever-widening expansion of its military superiority?
My answer is a resounding 'no.'" What will therefore happen? The prices
of dollar-denominated assets compared to those of non-dollar-denominated
assets" must fall, and fall drastically soon. Roach estimates: "a 20%
drop in real exchange rates and nearly double that in nominal terms,
higher real interest rates, reduced growth in domestic demand, and faster
growth overseas." ix
Opposition to US policies growing
Unprecedented global demonstrations
On 15 February 2003 in an unprecedented display
of solidarity more than 10 million people in 600 places around the world
delivered a clear NO! to the impending attack on Iraq by the US and
UK. Writing in the UK’s Guardian, George Monbiot has called for those
opposing the US to switch to Euro as a means of curbing American power.
xii
Brand-power starting to sink
A report completed in late July by the New York
consulting firm RoperASW, has shown that the value of America’s favourite
brands has slipped. Based on hour-long interviews with 30,000 consumers
in 30 major economies around the world, the report saw only one of the
top 10 global US-based firms increase its brand-power compared with
a year earlier. This is the 5th year that the survey has been carried
out and the first time that American companies have seen their brand-power
start to sink.
Professor John Quelch, dean of the Harvard Business
School believes that "Never before have global concerns about American
foreign policy so threatened to change consumer behaviour. We are not
speaking here of the frivolous grandstanding associated with temporary
boycotts by a student minority. We are witnessing the emergence of a
consumer lifestyle with broad international appeal that is grounded
in a rejection of American capitalism, American foreign policy and Brand
America." xiii
While the survey was not about the standing of
the dollar, given the decline in the brand-power of US-based firms,
the prospect of a dramatic decline in the value of the dollar as the
brand that underpins them all, will come as no surprise.
Warning signals coming from within the American
establishment.
Writing in Morgan Stanley’s Global Economic Forum,
Stephen Roach asserts that a "US-centric world" is unsustainable for
the world-economy and bad in particular for the United States. He argues
that the US will be unable to remake the world in its image and that
the attempt to do so is distinctly negative from the point of view of
large US investors. He believes the global economy is lopsided and "a
weaker dollar may be the only way out." xiv
The likely outcome.
Immanuel Wallerstein, one of America’s foremost
scholars expects the dollar’s collapse and everything to change geopolitically.
"The U.S. will no longer be able to live far beyond its means, to consume
at the rest of the world's expense. Americans may begin to feel what
countries in the Third World feel when faced by IMF-imposed structural
readjustment - a sharp downward thrust of their standard of living.
xv
The rest of the globe could topple the United
States from its hegemonic status whenever they so choose with a concerted
abandonment of the dollar standard. This is America's pre-eminent, inescapable
Achilles Heel for now and the foreseeable future. At the same time because
Asian countries – the US’s main creditors - are so heavily invested
in the US and while the US remains dependent on their investments, the
dollar’s reserve currency standing is unlikely to be superseded in the
near future.
In theory, the problems facing the US economy
might still be corrected, but only in theory, because it is impossible
to imagine such a dramatic policy reversal from Washington without some
great crisis to provoke it. According to Greider, American leadership
has instead become blind to the adverse balance of power accumulating
against it.
References. i) The Real Reasons for the
Upcoming War With Iraq - A Macroeconomic and Geostrategic Analysis of
the Unspoken Truth by W. Clark 6 March 2003 http://www.indymedia.org
ii) Iraq, The Dollar and the Euro by Hazel Henderson
April 2003
http://www.hazelhenderson.com/Iraq,%20the%20Dollar%20and%20the%20Euro.htm iii) The End of Empire by William Greider
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020923&s=greider iv) The bottom dollar - There is only one way
to check American power and that is to support the euro
George Monbiot, Monday April 21 2003, The Guardian v) The Fed is in a Dangerous Game with China
by Chen Zhao
Financial Times, July 30, 2003 vi) Is the US Trade Deficit Sustainable? Institute
for International Economics, Washington DC, 1999.
vii) See Finance & Development, Vol. 37, No. 1, March 2000. Can be downloaded from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2000/03/mann.htm viii) ‘Current Account Adjustment in Industrialized
Countries, ’ International Finance Discussion Paper No. 692, Board of
Governors, Federal Reserve Board, Washington DC, December 2000. Available
at http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2000/692/ifdp692.pdf
ix) ‘When the Tide Goes Out’, European Investment
Perspectives, Morgan Stanley, 13th February 2002. Also ‘Global Decoupling’
Global Economic Forum, Morgan Stanley, 30th January, 2002.
x) Europe Economics: Global Decoupling:
Chaotic or Orderly?, Global Strategy Bulletin, Morgan Stanley, 17 February,
2002.
xi) Empire and the Capitalists by Immanuel Wallerstein
May 15, 2003 http://fbc.binghamton.edu/113en.htm
xii) The bottom dollar - There is only one way
to check American power and that is to support the Euro
George Monbiot, Monday April 21 2003, The Guardian xiii) BRAND AMERICA: IRAQ'S CORPORATE COLLATERAL
DAMAGE
THE AGRIBUSINESS EXAMINER July 21, 2003, Issue #271 xiv) Empire and the Capitalists by Immanuel Wallerstein
xv) ibid
"After Capitalism - PROUT's vision for a new world" (2003) by Dada Maheshvarananda $29.95 from Proutist Universal Box 984, Nelson, NZ. "Alternative visions are crucial at this moment in history. Prout's co-operative model of economic democracy, based on cardinal human values and sharing the resources of the planet for the welfare of everyone, deserves our serious consideration." http://Noam-Chomsky.com For further information: http://www.prout.org / http://www.proutworld.org |
